Robotexts leaving Australians 'under attack...
Australians are being put at risk of serious financial loss through annoying scam messages, with some now receiving up to four robotexts in the span of an hour.
+44 1695 555520
Flow to Go
Verified profile
Skelmersdale
United Kingdom
Skelmersdale is a town in Lancashire, England, on the River Tawd, 6 miles west of Wigan, 13 miles northeast of Liverpool and 15 miles southwest of Preston. In 2006, it had a population of 38,813. The town is known locally as Skem . The first recorded use of the name Skelmersdale appears in the Domesday Book of 1086. It was under the rule of Uctred as part of the hundred of West Derby. The urbanisation and development of Skelmersdale largely coincided... Show more with the Industrial Revolution. Industrial scale coal mining began in the early 19th century and continued to expand during that century to give rise to Skelmersdale as an important colliery village. The town forms part of the Wigan Urban Area. Skelmersdale was designated as a new town in 1961.
Tips on articles
Phone scammers find new ways to trick Aussies
One in 10 Australians are being bombarded with an avalanche of nuisance calls from potential scammers, a new survey has found.
You might be interested
How long has this service been running and who is it for?
The service was created in 2011 in the Czech Republic. It is an online forum where the users can share their experience with phone numbers, both annoying (mostly telemarketing, surveys) and useful (e.g. couriers, offices). The service is for all those who want to know who a certain phone number 01695555520 belongs to and if it is desirable to answer a call from them.
What can the users learn about a number that is calling them?
Users can find other people’s rating of a phone number 01695555520, interest in a number in the last year, and, if possible, also the location of a number (for landlines).
How do we count views for a phone number?
It is a number of views of a page. Only one access a day is counted for a device. We try not to let the number be influenced by search engine access so it should only be the number of views by real visitors.
Other numbers in our database
What’s your experience with this number?